Notary Public

Sponsored by Steppin Out Dancers, the best way to step out with your love!
Laugh, Find romance on the dance floor!  Enjoy the feeling of holding someone close,
moving together as one to the music.  Every Saturday Night.
Visit our site at
Steppin Out Dancers for location and times.

"Faith is not believing that God can. It is knowing that God will. ".........Ben Stein

Where you will find the latest information from
"The Leader of the Old Guard"

   The Space Coast Tusk Vol 2 Issue 1 The Tusk Archives
Photos

Updated 6-16-2011

 

design logo
 

Rants and Ramblings

Nursing Homes

Comments can be made at my Blog Spot

Iowa Debates

Satellite Beach Special Community Redevelopment Meeting

Bickering at the BREC

Dangerous Change of Direction

Friendships 


Presenting State Proclamation at Commodore Barry Day


Receiving Proclamation from Satellite Bch.
Mayor Brimer on behalf of
ACS Relay for Life

Email
Frank

or

Feel free to contact me with any questions

321-777-9086

 

What happened to www.brevardgop.org? It still exists and is more popular then ever.  The name was changed to the Brevard Republican but the address remains the same.  www.brevardgop.org is still the most up to date website dedicated to Brevard Republican News.

Archived Opinion Columns


Nursing Homes

A one room apartment, a daybed, a television purchased by relatives, some personal pictures on the wall and a small bureau for what little possessions you can keep in there.  Prison?  You might think so but, rather, it is a room in an Assisted Living Facility for the elderly.  The only thing different is that there is a bathroom.

A dining hall, no menu, regimented times to eat.  A prison? No, the same ALF.

Some used paperback books sitting on an old shelf that is barely standing next to an old T.V. in front of an old couch.  You may wish to be in prison but it’s the same ALF.

As some of you know who know my family personally this Assisted Living Facility is in Connecticut.  It is attached to a nursing home that two years ago had 102 on their waiting list and now has 78.  They have an even longer list for someone with dementia, or as most know it as Alzheimers. 

I made a trip two years ago knowing that it wouldn’t be long before my sisters and I would have to make the decision we all dread but some of us have to face someday – placing an elderly parent in a nursing home.  We visited many homes and saw two that I would think of placing my mother in. Both had waiting lists that would necessitate having my mother move in with us while we waited.  What we would be waiting for would be either her acceptance into one of these places or her demise. 

Fast forward to the decision being made.   Now the hard part begins.  I know you thought the decision would be the difficult part but the really hard part is when you have to break the news to the elderly parent in question.  Next is moving them in.  Make it worse, bring her to Florida to be closer to her eldest son.

Let the search begin!  We, my wife and I, have visited at least 6 nursing or assisted living facilities in South Brevard County.  We learned there are a number of questions that must be asked:

1.      What is the daily cost (average from $175 to $210 per day then add food plans, health care assistance like assuring the person has supervised showers, etc… A DAY!

2.      Do you accept Medicaid (because of the above we are forced to be a member of the entitlement community)?

3.      Do you have a secure dementia ward?

4.      How long is their waiting list?

In many cases the answer to number 4 is that the list is long and the possibility of getting a family member into a nursing home that can oversee their disease is near impossible.  I’ve been told that a family can deal with this at home in their caring houses.  The needs of a dementia patient’s family are myriad and burden the family of a dementia patient are great and, in many cases, impossible.

I guess my major question is not so much about the waiting list but for the price these homes are charging I could put my family member in a Red Roof Inn, have meals delivered, get a gps and have nursing care come in daily and it would be cheaper. 

When did we let our elderly reach such a position as being turned out of proper assistance and aide?  How did this country reach the point of such little caring and sympathy?  Why can a Hotel and individual payments to specialists handle our disabled better then we can?

The requirements, the mandates, the government interference with the medical profession and the allow the legal profession file frivolous law suites with impunity has caused many doctors and nursing homes to pull their plaques down and move to safer locations or just close their doors.  Tort reform has been virtually forgotten in the rhetoric that we hear today about Medical Reform.  I don’t care if you favor Obama Care or the repeal of it.  Fix what is wrong.  Remember the old saw “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it”?  Well it’s broken but it can be fixed without turning the system upside down.

Do it before you need to write an article such as this.

 


 

Iowa Debates

On the day of the Iowa Debate, August 11, 2011, some talking heads, even on Fox said that the one that they think will come out of this the winner was going to be Ron Paul.  I watched the debate and listened carefully to every word as best I could.

Biggest Unelectable Winner - Newt Gingrich

Biggest Loser Ron Paul

Ron Paul is, in my mind, is the most delusional candidate in this race.  I heard a clear statement from him that didn’t change throughout the debate, “bury your head in the sand and bring our troops back…mind our own business”.  I felt that I was back in grammar school when we were told that if there was a nuclear attack to go under our desks cover your head and don’t look at the flash.  I think Ron Paul looked too long at the flash.

Ron Paul, in my opinion, was the biggest loser on the stage that evening.  Advocating allowing Iran to have nuclear weapons was the most outrageous statement made that night or maybe it was allowing terrorists to have all the rights of an American Citizen in our courts and under the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.  Let's see, what harm would it do if Iran had a nuke?  Who would it harm?  How about Afghanistan, Iraq ISRAEL and has he ever heard of a suitcase bomb?  He sounded like my mother's neighbor - did I mention she's in a nursing home?

Newt Gingrich came out fighting and accused the questioners of proposing “gotcha” questions and focusing on the minutia rather than on the greater problems in our nation.  He demanded that Congress and the President return to Washington to do the work of the people in the open and not behind closed doors.  He said the Super Committee is the most ridiculous thing to come out of D.C. in many years.

Then there was poor Rick Santorum who had to practically wave his arms to get to say anything.  When he did speak he made more sense than anyone speaking that night.

I was waiting for Don King to come out and give boxing gloves to Mitt Romney and Rick Pawlenty.  Pawlenty spent more time defending himself by attacking other candidates including, most heavily Michelle Bachman, than he spent explaining his positions.  He looked sexist and desperate.

During the second half of the debate Mitt Romney was hardly heard from.  I thought he and Pawlenty were out in the alley duking it out.

Michelle Bachman was asked the most sexist question and anti-Catholic question I have ever heard or expected from professional journalists when asked if she would be submissive to her husband and he actually used a Biblical verse to ask the question.

And what a surprise, no one would have raised the debt ceiling nor raise taxes and they would all create jobs.  I’m shocked!

Then there was Ron Huntsman.  That’s about all I can say about Don Huntsman, Ron Huntsman or whoever he is.

The most intelligent candidate was Newt Gingrich who I feel, unfortunately, has no chance of winning the primary and if for reason he did could not beat Obama.  Romney looked the most presidential but August 12th the entire field will change when we find out what Sarah Palin is doing in Iowa and when the official announcement that Rick Perry is a candidate.

Stay tuned.


Satellite Beach Special Community Redevelopment Meeting

(July 13, 201,1Satellite Bch.) On the heels of the County Special Taxing District meeting, the City of Satellite Beach held a special meeting to try to resolve the key issue facing the City, The Community Redevelopment Plan Advisory Agency (CRAAC).  The meeting ended with no immediate resolution but with the Board and City Council fielding questions and remarks from the public and setting another meeting in four weeks.  The City Attorney, James Beadle, and the City Manager, Michael Crotty, together with the State Joint Legislative Community Redevelopment Committee will be trying to resolve the main issue, can the CRA funnel money into the General Account then into the Fire/Rescue and Police budget to offset the additional cost of complying with the 25 year CRA Plan?

 The meeting room was standing room only and the doors were left open for those who could not find room inside.  A scattering of red shirts symbolizing opposition to CRAAC’s were seen in the room.

Mayor Joe Ferrante started the meeting explaining that the City Council often takes the form of various Councils and Agencies and they were meeting as the Community Development Advisory Agency.  He asked that applause not be displayed because that may intimidate some who would want to speak in opposition.

Present at the meeting were the chair and president of the regional state CRAAC organization who spoke about the importance of a CRAAC to a city to attract new residents and businesses.  They spoke about people who currently live in a community that were not residents long enough to know what the city looked like in the past and what, through the efforts of CRAAC’s, the city looks like now.  The funding for CRAACs are a compilation of city, county and state sales taxes and a portion of city’s property taxes.  The “impact” zone for Satellite Beach has been designated as State Rt. A1A, South Patrick Drive and Cassia Boulevard.  Some projects are a combination of private/public partnership.

The members of the City Council/CRAAC Board had the opportunity to ask questions after a power point presentation given by Comm. Dev. Dir. Laura Canady.  Board Member Scott Rhodes asked the Mayor and Ms. Canady what is being done to answer a question from Senator Jim Norman and the State Joint Legislative Community Redevelopment Committee regarding the possible misuse of CRAAC funds by using some of the funds to supplement the Fire/Rescue and Police Department budgets and the practices of the City’s CRAAC.

Councilman Rhodes pointed out that some cities were who used this practice was ordered to reimburse the The Community Redevelopment Plan Advisory Agency in their cities and the cost of that for some were as much as $5 million.  The possible impact to Satellite Beach could start at $1.2 million and rise from there.  Mayor Ferrante and City Manager Michael Crotty said they will be putting out a Request for Proposal for a performance audit and that the questions brought up in Senator Jim Norman’s letter will be addressed and answered within 30 days.  Councilman Scott said “all work should stop and all efforts should be focused on answering the legal questions asked within the week”. 

Questions were taken from the public.  Mayor Ferrante said that all questions pertaining to the CRAAC would be recorded, written out and answered if they couldn’t be answered at that meeting.  Cards requesting to speak would be pulled in no particular order.

One speaker, Gregg Billman, said “the council, the CRAAC employees and volunteers were either guilty of incompetence, malfeasance or misfeasance or all three”.  There were about 10 people who spoke and most were there to speak about subjects other than Community Redevelopment Plan.  Two speakers asked for a “forensic” audit.

Another issue brought to the Board was why the The Community Redevelopment Plan Advisory Agency plan currently available is labeled “Final Draft”.  City Manager Crotty explained that in 2002 and again in 2003 the “Final Draft” was adopted by ordinance as official.

To end the CRAAC portion of the meeting, Vice-Mayor Michael Chase went through the process that began the CRAAC for Satellite Beach.  He addressed the issue that The Community Redevelopment Plan Advisory Agency plan was a 25 year plan and at 9 years into any plan that plan would be adjusted.  The issue of moving CRAAC funds to the General Fund than to the Police and Fire/Rescue budgets were actually to enhance the community which is the basis of any Redevelopment plan.  When Jim Beadle was asked after the meeting what is the CRAAC Advisory Committee’s reasoning for this he replied “If they hadn’t used the money then the extra 6 firefighters hired to protect not just the Impact Zone but the entire city would not have been hired and community policing would not have been instituted.  Both these are enhancements to the City and that’s the purpose of the CRAAC.”

One citizen of Satellite Beach said that “we moved here because of the quality of life, the schools and the family community Satellite Beach is.  If it means paying an extra $100 a year to keep the City that way I wouldn’t mind paying it.”

To end the meeting Mayor Ferrante said “since 2002 the City has submitted an Audit to the County, State Joint Legislative Committee and the State Auditor General and has not received any negative comments on them.”

The Community Redevelopment Agency Advisory Committee meeting ended with the Mayor assuring those whose questions were not answered to do so within 30 days when the results of the Joint Legislation Redevelopment Committee presents their findings to the CRAAC.


Bickering at the BREC

Bickering at the BREC has resulted in the following letter going out and the email questioning the job description and the performance of the Vice-Chair of the Executive Committee.

The true finances of the BREC are in question and the health of the Committee is in the worst shape I have ever seen it and I have been involved with the BREC for over 15 years.  Although not currently a member I still receive regular questions from "the old guard" who remain as to what is the actual mission and duty of the Committee.  Those who have been active in local and state politics can't remember a time when the Republican Party of Brevard has been in such disarray.  Now the following is forwarded to me because the BREC Board doesn't keep in contact with staunch republicans who had been on the Committee.  Rather than keeping them in the loop those that leave for whatever reason are shunned as much Amish are shunned for not returning to the fold.  Enormous amount of institutional knowledge has been lost because of this behavior.

You be the judge:

 Dear BREC Members: 

As Precinct Committeemen and Committeewomen, we are leading the way in the grassroots efforts to insure Barack Obama is only a one-term President, elect a Republican Senator to replace Bill Nelson, and elect qualified Republicans to State and Local offices. 

In order to accomplish our goals, the Republican Party of Brevard needs your financial support along with your time and energy.  Your partnership and support is extremely important for us to continue to survive and support the Republican Party.  Please open up your hearts and your wallets and make a generous donation today.  We desperately need to pay our bills and maintain our Headquarters office.  Together we can make a difference and take back our country! 

Your Finance Committee and Executive Board is exploring other fundraising avenues, but we need your help and your ideas now.  

Please make checks payable to "Republican Party of Brevard" and mail them to the address below by June 30:

Republican Party of Brevard
PO Box 410153
Melbourne, FL 32941-0153

In the memo line of the check, in accordance with finance laws, please list your occupation.  Your cooperation and support is very much appreciated. 

Thank you in advance for your contribution. 

Best regards,
Barbara Davis, Chairman
Republican Party of Brevard
Home:  (321) 751-0797
Cell:  (321) 223-0808
barbara.davis@brevardrepublicans.org

www.brevardrepublicans.org

=================

From: James Marshal [mailto:james@shfnow.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 2:26 PM
To: 'Barbara Davis'
Cc: 'pdiaz@rpof.org'; 'Peter Fusscas'; 'Thomas, Tim'; 'Terry Bales'; 'Roman Scharf'; 'RMCBsecretary1@gmail.com'; 'josiahpatriot@aol.com'; 'margie Kinder'; 'barbjweiner@aol.com'; 'eddeanradio@yahoo.com'
Subject: RE: BREC requests financial support
 

Dear Chairwoman Davis, 

It is my understanding that fund raising is the responsibility of Vice Chairman Mr. Bob White.   Is this not true, as it has always been the Vice Chairman’s responsibility?   Did he not himself vow to focus on raising money during his bid for the Vice Chairman’s position?   Would it be appropriate to ask you to disclose how much Mr. White has actually raised our organization thus far, as I am unable to determine the answer to that question from the monthly Treasurers reports provided previously? 

You should know that Mr. White has attended the RMCB monthly meetings on several occasions as Vice Chair of the BREC.   While at our meetings and/or events, he had at various times requested to share an announcement which he was given the opportunity to voice.  However, rather than speaking about BREC fundraising or even BREC activities, to my surprise and to those in attendance as well,  he solicited additional support for the RLC organization and announced coming RLC events.  Additionally, in recent months while visiting other conservative clubs, I’ve seen Mr. White speak several times… each asking for funding for his new PAC organization and providing updates supporting the RLC; not one word about the needs of our BREC nor have I ever witnessed him support the BREC organization outside of our regular monthly meetings. 

If Mr. White had spent an equal amount of time in service to the BREC in the capacity of his duties as Vice Chairman, perhaps our BREC Chairwoman would not be requesting financial support today.   I suspect that we will not be receiving any such financial support request from the well run, efficient, and focused leadership of the RLC organization anytime soon. 

Perhaps the following Biblical quote may provide you solace in this regard:  Matthew 6:24 “No one can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other.” 

At your service, 

James Marshal

  • This letter has yet to be answered - Frank


 

Friendships 

Over the years I have learned one thing about many people.  I especially have come to appreciate real friendships but the truth is that people have very few friends, a little more when you speak of acquaintances and more who just like to say “I know him, he’s a close friend” when you actually met them once. 

Friends are those people who will be there for you when you call in the middle of the night without asking “why are you calling me”.  Friends are those who, when they hear a rumor, come to you to find out the truth and believe you.  Friends are people who give you the benefit of the doubt.  Friends are those who stand by you because they know you and trust in you. 

Over the past few years I have been sorely disappointed in some I considered friends.  I include in that groups, clubs and committees as well as individuals.  Power to some is worth the loss of a friend.  The feeling of “knowing something no one else knows” even if that “something” is so outrageous as to be totally ridiculous and not worth the “knowing”. 

I once was told I trust too many people and my only answer to that is that I would rather trust people and be disappointed than never trust anyone at all.  Loyalty is a word in the dictionary.  Faithfulness rarely exists. More than 50% of marriages fail which is one measurement of faithfulness, friendship and loyalty. 

It is a rare person that would value friendship over power.   It is a rare person that would rather agree to disagree and still remain friends.  I have worked for friends and had them turn their backs on me when they had the power to help.  I have trusted and been there for “friends in need” only to find that when a new person with different views comes into their lives they were quick to switch allegiances rather than understand that friends don’t need to have mutual friendships.  I have “friends” who insist on being right about almost any subject without actually checking facts and never gives you the benefit of the doubt.

You may hear from “friends” once a day, once a week, once a month or once a year.  I have friends I hear from occasionally but haven’t seen in years from the Service and from my youth.  I have friends who know much more then I about some subjects and no matter when or what I ask I get an answer.  I have friends who have been told they shouldn’t be a friend and remained loyal because they simply know me and knew better then to believe what someone who heard from someone had to say.  I have friends that feel I have helped them when all I did was what I consider the right thing to do and I DID NOT expect thanks.  Doing what is right does not require anything more than a simple “thank you”.

Sadly I have been disappointed many times but I still trust in some I call “friend” and feel that when help is needed I must be there for them sometimes fully knowing the help is not mutual. 

But that’s me and as often as I’m told I need to change my views and behavior when it comes to that level of trust I will always be a “friend” and will be there for those in need without expecting anything in return.  As many times as I say “I will never do that again” I know I will.

I hope I can call you “friend”.

I'm nobody! Who are you?
Are you nobody, too?
Then there's a pair of us -- don't tell!
They'd banish us, you know.

How dreary to be somebody!
How public, like a frog
To tell your name the livelong day
To an admiring bog!


Dangerous Change of Direction

The President, on May 19, 2011, state that the United States Position on the Middle East Crisis was to side with the Palestinians.  Every President since 1948 when Israel was created has tried to deal with this issue but have spoken on behalf of THE ADMINISTRATION.   

To radically change direction and turn our backs on our only real ally in the region is not just foolish, it’s insane. 

And what is his plan…to leave Israel defenseless and to give over to the sworn enemies of the Jewish nation more than half of Israel’s territory.  “Israel must be able to defend itself BY ITSELF.”  If we ever had a President who did not understand foreign relations and the impact of a Palestinian State run by Hammas and Fatah we have one now. 

President Obama in all his ignorance has called for a return to the 1967 borders.  He said, “a Palestinian State for a homeland for the Palestinian people, will secure a viable Palestine and a secure Israel based on 1967 lines for a Palestinian State.”   

For those who do not remember the ’67 war, Syria, Egypt and Lebanon amassed troops on the Israeli border.  Once the invasion began Israel defended itself and defeated all three nations.  The concessions made by the invaders were to give up the West Bank, the Golan Heights and the Gaza Strip.

 Anyone that has been to Israel knows that the indiscriminate bombing of Israel is coming from the Gaza Strip which is in Palestinian hands, and Jerusalem, the capital of Israel is in the West Bank and the from the Golan Heights Syria can reach any area of Israel with the least amount of effort. 

Brilliant plan.  And what do the Palestinians have to give…take out the clause in their charter about the destruction of Israel and recognize Israel’s right to exist.  In other words Israel gives up land and the Palestinians give up nothing.  This sounds to me like a road map to the destruction of Israel. 

Obama’s plan is like saying the United States should go back to the borders prior to when  California and Texas were taken from Mexico and give back those “occupied” territories to Mexico. 

Now let’s examine what this does for all Muslims in the Middle East.  In their eyes we have now changed sides and will be assisting them in obtaining a base for a Palestinian State that will be the training grounds for their efforts to push “the Jews” into the ocean.  They are adamant about the killing of all Jews no matter where they are found.  Some will say this is the belief of only the radical Muslims but we have now given those same radicals the hope of achieving their goals.  We have empowered the Muslim world by giving them the impression that we, the United States, not the Administration, is fully behind a Muslim take over.  What happens when they ask for our assistance and we don’t give it?  Are we then going to be their targets?  Have we now given those who want the destruction of not only Israel but the “Great Satan”, the United States, another reason to hate us as if in their minds they don’t have enough reason already? 

If President Obama thinks this will gain us a better reputation with the Muslim world he is delusional.   

As reported by FoxNews.comObama had no solution to the question of Hamas, and no blueprint for how to solve enormous conflicts over the status of Jerusalem and the fate of Palestinian refugees. The border issue, he conceded, was just a start.” 

Apparently Obama has no solution period and has done nothing more than make a complicated problem even more dangerous and even more difficult did, nothing to help the Palestinians, made matters worse  for Israel and the United States and has made the world a more dangerous place to live in. 

The full text: Obama's speech on the Middle East and North Africa


The Opinions Found On This Page Are Mine. 
They belong to me and I don't care whether you agree or not.

More of my rants will be made in the future.  Hopefully some, the few who read this, will take it to heart and start to make the changes needed and do it soon.